Bewertungen für Double-click Image Downloader
Double-click Image Downloader von Marnes
Bewertungen von Umpahpah
Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen
von Umpahpah, vor 6 JahrenHi, and thanks for all the work, that is first. The second, why I gave 3 stars, is due to 2 issues: First, it often save image without proper extension, which is a bit annoying, and second, it does not allow to save images where Save images as.... has been disabled, and I know it is not your fault, just to re-report, as I read the comments first. So, the biggest issue is extension flaw, sometimes.
Thanks for the reply - it is just then a question how the Save image as does not make that mistake....
In any way, I raised the review for one star :)
Thanks for the reply - it is just then a question how the Save image as does not make that mistake....
In any way, I raised the review for one star :)
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 6 JahrenThanks for the detailed feedback. As for file extensions, extensions are not actually a required thing in filenames, they're more of a loose convention. Websites tend to forego them depending on how their images are loaded (e.g. from data streams rather than files). It's the browser's responsibility to determine an extension if at all possible, based on data from the webserver if provided (such as a suggested filename, with or without extension). It's really not within an addon's power to ensure the presence of file extensions, or infer any, sorry.
186 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13790370, vor 9 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon FL015CH, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13323778, vor 3 MonatenGreat addon, if it could support custom download location it would be 5 star.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Gwarchdodwr Tir NaNog, vor 6 MonatenProbably one of the most useful extensions to Firefox that I've ever downloaded. Thank you.
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 11900036, vor 6 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon Bhargav Ram, vor 6 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 12759533, vor 6 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Alex Pedruzzi, vor 10 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Poltava, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon yensama, vor einem Jahr
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem JahrAs mentioned many times before (I should add this to the FAQ part), it depends on the website, this observation is not global. Many servers provide filename extensions one way or another, but e.g. twitter doesn't in any way (because websites don't need to) and my addon can't just take a wild guess as it. There will be an extension if the extension is communicated by the server as per standards. What a blown-out-of-proportion thing to give a permanent 1 star for anyway, as if that's all there is to it and as if it's any addon's fault a server decides not to expose extensions. Stupid "reviews" - more like baseless whines - like this are why I'm done developing for the public anyway.- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18347152, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 14624091, vor einem Jahr
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon ProtonLover, vor einem JahrOnly site this doesn't work on is pixiv is there a workaround at all if so? getting SERVER_FORBIDDEN
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem JahrSorry, they probably detect hotlinking (i.e. direct downloading) specifically to stop addons like this. Thank you for giving a reasonable rating to a functioning product, unlike all the petulant reviewers that go straight to 1 star for the silliest reasons as if it's a completely defective piece of junk. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon diego.ar, vor 2 Jahren
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 JahrenSome websites do things to stop addons like this from working, and I can't change that. But the addon definitely works on sites that don't take such countermeasures. I use it myself in the latest firefox, as do many other happy reviewers. Don't use reviews for misplaced and false bug reports, they belong in an email with proper information like which site you're trying to use it on. Simply writing "doesn't work" is an utter waste of everyone's time and blatantly wrong.- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon ragernothingworks, vor 2 JahrenIt just does not work, you can click all you like, it won't download on Firefox.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 JahrenSorry but I'm using firefox and this addon myself, and it definitely works, as it does for other people too. There are some sites that do things that prevent addons like this from working (e.g. clickable overlays on images), you may be trying to use it on such a site. Fair enough it doesn't work then but that's no basis to say this addon never works. Please use reviews only for serious, well prepared review content. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17999994, vor 2 Jahrenamazing does exactly what it says the hover button works best for my use case!
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Chillsaw, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 16803992, vor 2 JahrenI like hover "Download Button" on images, it's exactly what I'm looking for.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem JahrGlad you like it, I too used it more often than the titular feature actually - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon JebDude, vor 2 JahrenThis extension is great. A quick and easy "Download Button" on images is exactly what I was looking for.
I find that some sites really try to obfuscate their images. In that case I just have to analyze the src HTML to find the original link, open it, and then download.
But the quick-and-easy button is what I wanted. Thanks dev!Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem JahrThank you for knowing what you're talking about before commenting and having realistic expectations unlike some people. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon RogCBrand, vor 2 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Kajjo, vor 2 Jahren