Reviews for NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite by Giorgio Maone
Review by thunder_dream
Rated 2 out of 5
by thunder_dream, 3 years agoI use to love this extension but it's gotten to where it blocks everything. Even when I return to a previously viewed site it still blocks them. These include secure medical sites. I've used this extension for years, and I am having to remove it. I wish it was a little less extreme than it has become.
Developer response
posted 3 years agoHi, nothing has changed about what's blocked and what not: you decide which sites should be fully functional by setting them to TRUSTED.
Either somehow your previous settings have been erased (a botched Firefox update or a "privacy" software deleting more browser data than it should) or something changed in the dependencies of the sites which stopped working, and some other "new" script source needs to be allowed.
Either somehow your previous settings have been erased (a botched Firefox update or a "privacy" software deleting more browser data than it should) or something changed in the dependencies of the sites which stopped working, and some other "new" script source needs to be allowed.
2,375 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, 7 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19088604, a day ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by kk, 2 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19072892, 8 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by cwqing1973, 12 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14468519, 13 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by rabbitshee, 14 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19047433, 17 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by A. Bilmanda, 19 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Lazer Bear, 20 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Sembler, a month ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 15056996, a month agoissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Rated 5 out of 5by 确悫恪刻, a month agoNoScript还是很好的，不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过，文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 17847461, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18989716, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Max, 2 months agoI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Rated 5 out of 5by LittleFire, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Absinthe, 2 months ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by thofree, 2 months agoGets detected by Youtube's anti ad-block stuff. Wish you had a button to turn it off easily for a website without disabling it entirely.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18920843, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18315395, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by VonD68, 2 months ago