Recensiones de NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite per Giorgio Maone
Recension de Usator de Firefox 13551624
Classificate 2 de 5
per Usator de Firefox 13551624, pred 8 rokmiIt is a real pitty that you do not seem to want to listen to the incredible ammount of people who are trying to tell you that you messed this up.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
Responsa de disveloppator
publicate pred 8 rokmi"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2380 recensiones
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 18218075, pred 11 minútami
- Classificate 5 de 5per fiendkaka, pred 2 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per Shannon Sobeck, pred 3 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 19072847, pred 5 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, pred 9 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 19088604, pred 10 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per kk, pred 11 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 19072892, pred 17 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per cwqing1973, pred 21 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 14468519, pred 22 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per rabbitshee, pred 24 dňami
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 19047433, pred mesiacom
- Classificate 5 de 5per A. Bilmanda, pred mesiacom
- Classificate 5 de 5per Lazer Bear, pred mesiacom
- Classificate 5 de 5per Sembler, pred mesiacom
- Classificate 2 de 5per Usator de Firefox 15056996, pred 2 mesiacmiissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Classificate 5 de 5per 确悫恪刻, pred 2 mesiacmiNoScript还是很好的，不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过，文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Classificate 4 de 5per Usator de Firefox 17847461, pred 2 mesiacmi
- Classificate 5 de 5per Usator de Firefox 18989716, pred 2 mesiacmi
- Classificate 1 de 5per Max, pred 2 mesiacmiI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Classificate 5 de 5per LittleFire, pred 2 mesiacmi
- Classificate 5 de 5per Absinthe, pred 2 mesiacmi