Recensioni per NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite di Giorgio Maone
Recensione di Utente Firefox 13566908
Valutata 3 su 5
di Utente Firefox 13566908, 8 anni faI have used noScript for years now. It is an essential part of my browsing. However since Quantum the UI for it is no longer intuitive and I am having issues running other extensions such as flipIt (flipboard) because I see no way to allow flipboard script to run.
I would really like to see the old UI return as it was way more intuitive. Now I have to go through multiple steps to get to the allow script option for just a few scripts on a page.
Also if there is a method in which to cross check what kind of scripts are running when using certain extensions like flipIt (flipboard) are activated that would be fantastic as well.
As of now it appears I need to run my fireFox without no Script because I am not able to get the functionality I once had before Quantum. Which I am sure will sooner or later become available.
thanks for the work on this addOn it is great!
Only reason it is 3 stars and not 5 is because it is not quite there as far as quantum compatibility and functioning.
I would really like to see the old UI return as it was way more intuitive. Now I have to go through multiple steps to get to the allow script option for just a few scripts on a page.
Also if there is a method in which to cross check what kind of scripts are running when using certain extensions like flipIt (flipboard) are activated that would be fantastic as well.
As of now it appears I need to run my fireFox without no Script because I am not able to get the functionality I once had before Quantum. Which I am sure will sooner or later become available.
thanks for the work on this addOn it is great!
Only reason it is 3 stars and not 5 is because it is not quite there as far as quantum compatibility and functioning.
2.381 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18218075, 2 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di elsen, 3 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di fiendkaka, 4 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Shannon Sobeck, 5 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19072847, 7 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, 11 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19088604, 12 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di kk, 13 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19072892, 19 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di cwqing1973, 23 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 14468519, 24 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di rabbitshee, 25 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19047433, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di A. Bilmanda, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Lazer Bear, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Sembler, un mese fa
- Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 15056996, 2 mesi faissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 17847461, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18989716, 2 mesi fa
- I really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Valutata 5 su 5di LittleFire, 2 mesi fa