Vurdering for SingleFile
SingleFile av gildas
Vurdering av Firefox user 15950945
Vurdering: 3 av 5
av Firefox user 15950945, 5 år sidanGood idea in general but it seems to have problems with pictures, just an example
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
963 vurderingar
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Ka, 2 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 1 av 5av Prince Antwi, 8 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox user 19048867, 12 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av A. Bilmanda, 15 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av pnkntr, 23 dagar sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox user 19016964, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Toukon, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av ali, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 4 av 5av tuxmux, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox user 18680106, ein månad sidanWorks exactly as advertised, finally pressing Ctrl+S actually does what it's supposed to instead of making a broken document.
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Soren, ein månad sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av LCharlles, 2 månader sidanThis can deal with many pages that are not correctly saved in default setting of firefox
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox user 18978921, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av addonexplorer, 2 månader sidanExcellent archival tool! These days you cannot trust that any page will be available or drastically modified in the future.
SingleFile grabs everything or just parts, incredibly usefu and I use this along with Obsidian webclipper + Obsidian. - Vurdering: 5 av 5av Firefox user 18977738, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av Goston, 2 månader sidan
- Vurdering: 5 av 5av OverLordGoldDragon, 2 månader sidan