Análises de Double-click Image Downloader
Double-click Image Downloader por Marnes
Análise de alphapack
Writing this review to give you an idea to fix already known issue (https://04.yfhome.xyz/en-US/firefox/addon/double-click-image-download/reviews/1464906/).
SOLUTION: Find a way to check if the filename contains any extension, if it doesn't then try to find the image type (AFAIK a lot of sites can do this already, so there might be a library for that) and then just add it to the filename.
Good luck :)
SOLUTION: Find a way to check if the filename contains any extension, if it doesn't then try to find the image type (AFAIK a lot of sites can do this already, so there might be a library for that) and then just add it to the filename.
Good luck :)
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 5 anosThanks for the constructive input, but unfortunately filename extensions are not a reliable way to determine file types. They can be missing, simply incorrect (how often I've come across a .jpg that was actually a png and vice versa...), or some website-specific filename thing that happens to have a period in it so it looks like an extension. Browsers can determine the content type themselves by looking at the data, but in HTTP requests the convention is that the server must provide a human-friendly filename with a convenient extension and only the browser can make a last ditch attempt. If a server provides no meaningful name for a file triggered by this addon, then there's nothing it can do to help the situation, it's the least qualified party involved.
186 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 13790370 do Firefox, há 13 dias
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Usuário 13323778 do Firefox, há 3 mesesGreat addon, if it could support custom download location it would be 5 star.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Gwarchdodwr Tir NaNog, há 6 mesesProbably one of the most useful extensions to Firefox that I've ever downloaded. Thank you.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 11900036 do Firefox, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Bhargav Ram, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 12759533 do Firefox, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Alex Pedruzzi, há 10 meses
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há um anoAs mentioned many times before (I should add this to the FAQ part), it depends on the website, this observation is not global. Many servers provide filename extensions one way or another, but e.g. twitter doesn't in any way (because websites don't need to) and my addon can't just take a wild guess as it. There will be an extension if the extension is communicated by the server as per standards. What a blown-out-of-proportion thing to give a permanent 1 star for anyway, as if that's all there is to it and as if it's any addon's fault a server decides not to expose extensions. Stupid "reviews" - more like baseless whines - like this are why I'm done developing for the public anyway.- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18347152 do Firefox, há um ano
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 14624091 do Firefox, há um ano
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por ProtonLover, há um anoOnly site this doesn't work on is pixiv is there a workaround at all if so? getting SERVER_FORBIDDEN
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há um anoSorry, they probably detect hotlinking (i.e. direct downloading) specifically to stop addons like this. Thank you for giving a reasonable rating to a functioning product, unlike all the petulant reviewers that go straight to 1 star for the silliest reasons as if it's a completely defective piece of junk. Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 2 anosSome websites do things to stop addons like this from working, and I can't change that. But the addon definitely works on sites that don't take such countermeasures. I use it myself in the latest firefox, as do many other happy reviewers. Don't use reviews for misplaced and false bug reports, they belong in an email with proper information like which site you're trying to use it on. Simply writing "doesn't work" is an utter waste of everyone's time and blatantly wrong.- Avaliado em 1 de 5por ragernothingworks, há 2 anosIt just does not work, you can click all you like, it won't download on Firefox.
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 2 anosSorry but I'm using firefox and this addon myself, and it definitely works, as it does for other people too. There are some sites that do things that prevent addons like this from working (e.g. clickable overlays on images), you may be trying to use it on such a site. Fair enough it doesn't work then but that's no basis to say this addon never works. Please use reviews only for serious, well prepared review content. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17999994 do Firefox, há 2 anosamazing does exactly what it says the hover button works best for my use case!
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 16803992 do Firefox, há 2 anosI like hover "Download Button" on images, it's exactly what I'm looking for.
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há um anoGlad you like it, I too used it more often than the titular feature actually - This extension is great. A quick and easy "Download Button" on images is exactly what I was looking for.
I find that some sites really try to obfuscate their images. In that case I just have to analyze the src HTML to find the original link, open it, and then download.
But the quick-and-easy button is what I wanted. Thanks dev!Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há um anoThank you for knowing what you're talking about before commenting and having realistic expectations unlike some people.