Recensioner för NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite av Giorgio Maone
Recension av Daniel Saner
Betygsatt 4 av 5
av Daniel Saner, för 8 år sedanTo all the people complaining about the new UI (not that I expect any of them to see this): Giorgio can't revert back to the old UI because that kind of UI is no longer supported on Firefox 57 and above. Nice things like native drop-down menus and dialog boxes are no longer allowed. Those were part of XUL addons. Now we only have WebExtensions add-ons à la Chrome, and if you know Chrome, you know that its add-on interface situation is the same. "Nice" UIs have been prohibited by Mozilla, on purpose, so your gripe is with them, not with Giorgio, the developer of this add-on.
I do agree that the UI could use some work anyway, though, in terms of understandability, ease of use, and looks. But this is still an early version which had to be released in a rush, so give it a while.
I'll still deduct one star from my previous rating because too much comfort functionality is missing at the moment. Temporary exceptions, selective and site-wide, were one of my most-used features of NoScript, and they're not in yet. Also, the options screen is severely lacking, a lot of the behaviour I used to customise can't be changed right now. I assume that all of these things are still possible, and just haven't been implemented yet. Part of that blame, once again, can be put on Mozilla for their hasty and clumsy shutdown of XUL extensions and the rushed und grossly unfinished transition to WebExtensions, which is making life hard for all add-on developers.
I do agree that the UI could use some work anyway, though, in terms of understandability, ease of use, and looks. But this is still an early version which had to be released in a rush, so give it a while.
I'll still deduct one star from my previous rating because too much comfort functionality is missing at the moment. Temporary exceptions, selective and site-wide, were one of my most-used features of NoScript, and they're not in yet. Also, the options screen is severely lacking, a lot of the behaviour I used to customise can't be changed right now. I assume that all of these things are still possible, and just haven't been implemented yet. Part of that blame, once again, can be put on Mozilla for their hasty and clumsy shutdown of XUL extensions and the rushed und grossly unfinished transition to WebExtensions, which is making life hard for all add-on developers.
2 380 recensioner
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 18218075, för 2 timmar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av elsen, för en dag sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av fiendkaka, för 2 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Shannon Sobeck, för 3 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19072847, för 5 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, för 10 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19088604, för 10 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av kk, för 11 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19072892, för 17 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av cwqing1973, för 21 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14468519, för 22 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av rabbitshee, för 24 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19047433, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av A. Bilmanda, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Lazer Bear, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Sembler, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 2 av 5av Firefox-användare 15056996, för 2 månader sedanissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av 确悫恪刻, för 2 månader sedanNoScript还是很好的，不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过，文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 17847461, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 18989716, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Max, för 2 månader sedanI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av LittleFire, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Absinthe, för 2 månader sedan