Untuk menggunakan pengaya ini, Anda harus mengunduh Firefox.

Masuk
Ikon pengaya

Ulasan untuk Link Status Redux

Link Status Redux oleh Juha Aatrokoski

Diberi peringkat 4,7 bintang dari 5
5
24
4
2
3
2
2
0
1
1
24 ulasan
  • oleh technoxenoholic, 6 hari yang lalu
    extremely helpful for keeping track of already-visited pages such as videos and articles. unfortunately, the addon fails to recognize "link" and "link+tracking" as the same address. in cases such as youtube's randomly-appearing "&pp=" parameter additions to links (added to different links on the page with each refresh), the addon will not recognize that it should be flagging a video url as already visited. if such tracking parameters were ignored and the same link with and without the tracking parameters were considered synonymous (as it were), this addon would earn five stars.

    edit to reply to developer: unfortunately my hunt for the perfect url-cleaner extension hasn't turned up anything that can de-track the links on a webpage yet -- only while copying links (by using a separate context menu option) or on click/request (navigating to the cleaned link; although some parameters still aren't cleaned unless i copy a clean link and paste into the url bar manually). i'm not familiar enough with javascript or jquery to pursue possible solutions to that end on my own, although from my research so far it seems to be possible for someone who *does* know how to do javascript/jquery(/possibly both?). should i find anything, i'll come back with another update. in the meantime i'll bump this addon rating to five stars since my only issue is an outside factor.

    Balasan pengembang

    dikirim 4 hari yang lalu
    I have also noticed this annoyance and agree that such functionality would be useful, but unfortunately it is "not possible" within the context and scope of LSR.

    The first problem is that as it is entirely up to the website which search parameters are significant wrt. the page content ("v") and which are not ("pp"), you cannot just blindly ignore/remove parameters; you need to have a database matching websites to safe-to-remove (tracking) parameters, *and* you have to keep it up-to-date. This maintenance of its own database, or reliance on an external one, is out of scope for LSR.

    The second problem is that the browser history API does not have good support for partial URL matching (when querying whether a a link is visited or not), and even if it did, things could get complicated (removing parameters from the middle, reordering of parameters, etc.). This is not an issue if all browsing is "sanitized" by stripping tracking parameters from both web page links and every request made (as clicking a link is not the only way that requests can happen). In such case partial matching is not needed as both pages and history lack tracking parameters.

    The solution is to use a separate anti-tracking extension that does the full sanitization i.e. strips tracking parts from both page links and all requests. I have not looked into this at all, but I am pretty sure these add-ons do exist. However, some (if not all) of them *may* strip tracking info only from requests made, not from page links, in which case it does not help with LSR (in fact it could make it worse wrt. LSR). Let me know if you find a suitable one.
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 18530539, 3 bulan yang lalu
  • oleh Coroner, setahun yang lalu
    Пользуюсь много лет, весьма доволен.
  • oleh Hamid_Y2K, 2 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 17608465, 3 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh DennyC, 3 tahun yang lalu
    The best and most important addon! Thank you!!
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 13207487, 3 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh grahamperrin, 3 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh Vanav, 4 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh Rui Andrada, 4 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh ergonomic-cat, 5 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 12564382, 5 tahun yang lalu
    I've only used this for 30 seconds, but I think it should be stock. I will update my review if my opinion majorly changes.
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 14064657, 5 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh LostPacket, 6 tahun yang lalu
    Thank you for a nice extension.

    2019-09-07 OP (now obsolete): I am seeing one (old) bug though: placement next to mouse cursor works correctly only at 100% zoom level. At other zoom levels, the popup gets proportionally misplaced (position seems to be relative to top/left corner of the page).
    2019-11-08 Edit: Fix in 3.11 confirmed, thank you (rating adjusted accordingly).

    Balasan pengembang

    dikirim 6 tahun yang lalu
    The bug seems to be difficult/impossible to fix, see https://github.com/jaatroko/link-status-redux/issues/23 for details. Edit: fixed in version 3.11.
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 14535628, 6 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 15167684, 6 tahun yang lalu
    Awesome extension! It's working on 68.0.1. I particularly liked the documentation, I've opted to replace the native status panel by disabling it via userChrome.css. This and "Dark Scroll" extension are a must have for cleaning up Firefox UI.
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 15104231, 6 tahun yang lalu
    Lightweight and dead simple. This thing is great. Unbelievable that Mozilla doesn't include it in Firefox. STILL works as of Firefox 67 (in July of 2019). Nice.
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 14644405, 6 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh dj, 7 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 5509417, 7 tahun yang lalu
    For the bookmark bar can not work in F61.0.2?

    Balasan pengembang

    dikirim 7 tahun yang lalu
    No. Unless you have knowledge to the contrary, the WebExtension API has not been amended to allow this.
  • oleh aCafela coffee, 7 tahun yang lalu
  • oleh Pengguna Firefox 14142584, 7 tahun yang lalu
    LOVE IT :D
    love it love it, thank you Sir :D
  • oleh Mirek, 8 tahun yang lalu
    Many thanks for migrating addon to WebExtensions and making it compatible with Fx57+ :-). Do you think it is possible with current WE API to handle also bookmarks (for example in bookmarks toolbar)?
    **Edit: I didn't delete (at least intentionally) my previous review with your answer - it was automatically removed by AMO when I posted this one...

    Balasan pengembang

    dikirim 8 tahun yang lalu
    With the current API, not really. Technically, a WE can create its own sidebar and populate it with the bookmarks. BUT: it's a bit out of scope for LSR, it's a fair amount of effort for questionable gain, and it won't be as good as the native bookmarks sidebar anyway (no favicons; colors and folder etc. icons won't be OS/Firefox-themed).
  • oleh Care, 8 tahun yang lalu