Bu eklentileri kullanmak için Firefox’u indirmeniz gerekiyor.

Giriş
Eklenti simgesi

Link Status Redux incelemeleri

Link Status Redux geliştiren: Juha Aatrokoski

5 üzerinden 4,7 puan
5
24
4
2
3
2
2
0
1
1
24 inceleme
  • yazan: technoxenoholic, 6 gün önce
    extremely helpful for keeping track of already-visited pages such as videos and articles. unfortunately, the addon fails to recognize "link" and "link+tracking" as the same address. in cases such as youtube's randomly-appearing "&pp=" parameter additions to links (added to different links on the page with each refresh), the addon will not recognize that it should be flagging a video url as already visited. if such tracking parameters were ignored and the same link with and without the tracking parameters were considered synonymous (as it were), this addon would earn five stars.

    edit to reply to developer: unfortunately my hunt for the perfect url-cleaner extension hasn't turned up anything that can de-track the links on a webpage yet -- only while copying links (by using a separate context menu option) or on click/request (navigating to the cleaned link; although some parameters still aren't cleaned unless i copy a clean link and paste into the url bar manually). i'm not familiar enough with javascript or jquery to pursue possible solutions to that end on my own, although from my research so far it seems to be possible for someone who *does* know how to do javascript/jquery(/possibly both?). should i find anything, i'll come back with another update. in the meantime i'll bump this addon rating to five stars since my only issue is an outside factor.

    Geliştiricinin yanıtı

    gönderilme: 4 gün önce
    I have also noticed this annoyance and agree that such functionality would be useful, but unfortunately it is "not possible" within the context and scope of LSR.

    The first problem is that as it is entirely up to the website which search parameters are significant wrt. the page content ("v") and which are not ("pp"), you cannot just blindly ignore/remove parameters; you need to have a database matching websites to safe-to-remove (tracking) parameters, *and* you have to keep it up-to-date. This maintenance of its own database, or reliance on an external one, is out of scope for LSR.

    The second problem is that the browser history API does not have good support for partial URL matching (when querying whether a a link is visited or not), and even if it did, things could get complicated (removing parameters from the middle, reordering of parameters, etc.). This is not an issue if all browsing is "sanitized" by stripping tracking parameters from both web page links and every request made (as clicking a link is not the only way that requests can happen). In such case partial matching is not needed as both pages and history lack tracking parameters.

    The solution is to use a separate anti-tracking extension that does the full sanitization i.e. strips tracking parts from both page links and all requests. I have not looked into this at all, but I am pretty sure these add-ons do exist. However, some (if not all) of them *may* strip tracking info only from requests made, not from page links, in which case it does not help with LSR (in fact it could make it worse wrt. LSR). Let me know if you find a suitable one.
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 18530539, 3 ay önce
  • yazan: Coroner, bir yıl önce
    Пользуюсь много лет, весьма доволен.
  • yazan: Hamid_Y2K, 2 yıl önce
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 17608465, 3 yıl önce
  • yazan: DennyC, 3 yıl önce
    The best and most important addon! Thank you!!
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 13207487, 3 yıl önce
  • yazan: grahamperrin, 3 yıl önce
  • yazan: Vanav, 4 yıl önce
  • yazan: Rui Andrada, 4 yıl önce
  • yazan: ergonomic-cat, 5 yıl önce
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 12564382, 5 yıl önce
    I've only used this for 30 seconds, but I think it should be stock. I will update my review if my opinion majorly changes.
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 14064657, 5 yıl önce
  • yazan: LostPacket, 6 yıl önce
    Thank you for a nice extension.

    2019-09-07 OP (now obsolete): I am seeing one (old) bug though: placement next to mouse cursor works correctly only at 100% zoom level. At other zoom levels, the popup gets proportionally misplaced (position seems to be relative to top/left corner of the page).
    2019-11-08 Edit: Fix in 3.11 confirmed, thank you (rating adjusted accordingly).

    Geliştiricinin yanıtı

    gönderilme: 6 yıl önce
    The bug seems to be difficult/impossible to fix, see https://github.com/jaatroko/link-status-redux/issues/23 for details. Edit: fixed in version 3.11.
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 14535628, 6 yıl önce
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 15167684, 6 yıl önce
    Awesome extension! It's working on 68.0.1. I particularly liked the documentation, I've opted to replace the native status panel by disabling it via userChrome.css. This and "Dark Scroll" extension are a must have for cleaning up Firefox UI.
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 15104231, 6 yıl önce
    Lightweight and dead simple. This thing is great. Unbelievable that Mozilla doesn't include it in Firefox. STILL works as of Firefox 67 (in July of 2019). Nice.
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 14644405, 6 yıl önce
  • yazan: dj, 7 yıl önce
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 5509417, 7 yıl önce
    For the bookmark bar can not work in F61.0.2?

    Geliştiricinin yanıtı

    gönderilme: 7 yıl önce
    No. Unless you have knowledge to the contrary, the WebExtension API has not been amended to allow this.
  • yazan: aCafela coffee, 7 yıl önce
  • yazan: Firefox kullanıcısı 14142584, 7 yıl önce
    LOVE IT :D
    love it love it, thank you Sir :D
  • yazan: Mirek, 8 yıl önce
    Many thanks for migrating addon to WebExtensions and making it compatible with Fx57+ :-). Do you think it is possible with current WE API to handle also bookmarks (for example in bookmarks toolbar)?
    **Edit: I didn't delete (at least intentionally) my previous review with your answer - it was automatically removed by AMO when I posted this one...

    Geliştiricinin yanıtı

    gönderilme: 8 yıl önce
    With the current API, not really. Technically, a WE can create its own sidebar and populate it with the bookmarks. BUT: it's a bit out of scope for LSR, it's a fair amount of effort for questionable gain, and it won't be as good as the native bookmarks sidebar anyway (no favicons; colors and folder etc. icons won't be OS/Firefox-themed).
  • yazan: Care, 8 yıl önce